Eyes on Miller
Since this is in response to remarks made two weeks ago, thought it would be good to post this as a new thread rather than a comment.
Eyes wrote: "In a way, Miller is a salesman. He caters to our weakness and
What evidence do you have to support your assertion that Miller consciously seeks not to "push the envelope" too much -- in your words, not to "challenge the dominant ideology" too much?
More Eyes: "God's frightening power, his fearsom rod of correction, and the aggressively reactionary nature of the gospel message is largely ignored."
I would tend to agree that this biblical theme is not loudly spoken of in Miller's book. By the way, what do you mean by the "aggressively reactionary nature of the gospel?" Please elaborate.
Eyes again: "Miller's tendency to make startling deferences to American postmodernism deserves our attention. Chapters 5,6,7 are so much about "me", so much less about "us" and even less still about "Him" that I feel unsettled."
Are you equating postmodernism with self-centeredness? I think a handful of us in this community consider ourselves postmoderns (myself included), but I should hope not to be thought of as self-centered for that reason -- I'm perfectly self-centered all by myself, thank you very much; I hardly need any help from any particular world view.
On the whole, I disagree that "Blue Like Jazz" is not about Him, although I admit I don't have the particular content of chs. 5-7 in view when I say this. I find the material challenging to me on a personal level. In particular, I resonate with the kind of thinking that led Miller to describe his perception of the world as a story about him in which other people play minor roles. I want to become a more considerate, thoughtful, loving person, and I think the Lord is using this book to achieve this in me.